How are fossils dated using relative dating is dating someone 10 years older wrong
Consider a lake that dries out or somehow contains older sediments that are washed into it.These sediments are deposited on top of younger sediments currently being deposited in the lake.This approach avoids the circularity associated with using fossils to correlate rocks, and then using those correlations to infer biological patterns…” (“Cambrian Explosion: New Timeline for Appearances of Skeletal Animals in Fossil Record,” , Nov.10, 2010.) “In about 1830, Charles Lyell, Paul Deshayes, and Heinrich George Bronn independently developed a biostratigraphic technique [geologic column] for dating Cenozoic deposits based on relative proportions of living and extinct species of fossil mollusks….For example, archaeologists might date materials based upon relative depth of burial in a site.
But the fossil order itself is based on the order of strata and the assumption of evolution.The series of quotes begins with a vivid illustration of this circular reasoning in action.(Welles, Samuel Paul, “Paleontology,” In some cases darwinists have recognized circularity as a typical problem in evolutionary models and worked to avoid it.The resulting sequence from the bottom-most sediments would be oldest-to- young-to- older.The weakness of evolutionary theory can be demonstrated by the tautologies and circular reasoning that is employed to provide “evidence” for large scale evolution.
A substantial hurdle is the difficulty of working out fossil ages.